Skewed Morality
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
A man receives two life sentences. Later, those sentences are reduced from consecutive to concurrent in exchange for cooperation.
He will still die in prison. So what changed? This episode isn’t about legal procedure. It’s about moral messaging. When sentencing shifts without materially changing outcome, does that alter justice — or just its symbolism?
Are we pursuing accountability, strategy, or performance?
And when moral clarity becomes negotiable, what does that do to our collective trust?
Not outrage. Reflection.
Please explore my books: Principles of Decision-Making and People: https://a.co/d/0kPf0BXEmpowerment: A Journey of Discovery: https://a.co/d/9Z0yj44
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_c
No reviews yet